Tenant Improvement (TI) Plan Review Checklist

The short answer: A tenant improvement (TI) submittal clears plan review when it shows, clearly and completely: a code analysis (occupancy classification, code editions, occupant load), compliant means of egress sized to that load, accessibility compliance for the altered space and path of travel, coordinated MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing — including any new equipment loads and fixtures), and the completeness items reviewers expect (required sheets, title-block/stamp info, and consistency between drawings). Most TI rejections aren't exotic — they're a wrong or missing occupant load, egress that doesn't match the new layout, accessibility gaps in the altered area, fixtures not reconciled to the new occupancy, or missing/inconsistent information. Running these checks before submittal is what avoids the resubmittal-and-re-review cycle that delays the permit.

The core checklist

Code analysis

  • Occupancy classification for the tenant space (and whether the TI triggers a change of occupancy).
  • Code editions cited match the jurisdiction's adopted editions.
  • Occupant load recalculated for the new layout/use (see our occupant load guide).

Egress

  • Number of exits and egress width sized to the new occupant load (see our means of egress guide).
  • Common path, travel distance, and exit separation within limits for the new plan.
  • Egress doors, hardware, and signage shown.

Accessibility

  • Altered area and the path of travel to it meet accessibility requirements.
  • Accessible restrooms, route, clearances, and reach ranges in the affected scope.

MEP

  • New equipment connected loads coordinated; service/panel adequacy addressed.
  • Plumbing fixtures reconciled to the new occupancy/occupant load.
  • Mechanical ventilation/exhaust for the new use (and any kitchen hoods).

Completeness

  • All required sheets included.
  • Title block, project info, and professional stamp complete.
  • Drawings internally consistent (the schedule matches the plan, etc.).

Why TIs get returned

The recurring causes: occupant load not updated for the new use; egress that fit the old layout but not the new; accessibility not addressed in the altered area; fixtures not matching the new occupancy; and plain incompleteness. Each is catchable before submittal. See also what plan reviewers check.

Catch these issues before you submit

Run a Free Pre-Review →

General guidance under the model codes; your AHJ's adopted codes, amendments, and submittal requirements govern. Verify against your codes of record.

← Browse all guidesRun a free scan →